Startups

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Research Parks: An alternative to giving up equity

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Research parks and commercialization centres provide a real alternative for start-ups with high growth potential. They have benefits and drawbacks, and depending on your needs, they may or may not be the answer for your start-up.

Pros:

  • Graduated rent payments
  • Fully-equipped workstations (telephones, internet and furniture)
  • Wet labs
  • Dry labs
  • Shared meeting rooms
  • Cold rooms
  • Darkrooms
  • Autoclaves
  • No equity surrendering
  • No strings attached

Cons:

  • No accounting services
  • No access to legal counselling
  • No special access to industry mentors
  • No access to a line-of-credit

Again the itemized drawbacks pale in comparison to the benefits – or do they? If your organization is housed in a research park, how have you gained access to services provided by the accelerators?

The answer is complex and very personal. However, both options offer welcoming environments that want to see technology innovators succeed in the knowledge-based economy.

What solutions has your start-up found to this housing question? Where did you decide to grow your business: an accelerator, a traditional research park or neither?

Embrace Failure

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

This is one big reason why we don’t do as well as our friends in the US.

They will bet the farm on a good technology, a clear marketing focus and great people so that if they win, they win big.  And they lose big too.  They accept ‘creative destruction’ and move on.

We tend to settle for lower goals, lower risks, lower returns and faster exits.  With some glorious exceptions, we don’t have big  technology firms because we are punished for failing rather than supported for trying.

Who has not learned enormous lessons from big failures?  Perhaps we need a very public forum for those who rolled the dice and lost to tell us how they blew it and what they are doing next?  I am sure our culture might even find government grants to support this in the name of free speech? Facebook for Failures?  Twitter for Turkeys?

Politics – the Achilles heel of the tech industry in BC

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Many of the big decisions that affect this industry, and most others, are made by government.

Government is supposedly run by the elected politicians (with all due deference to the professional civil service).  So, why is that so many tech companies just ignore the political process or hope that they can leave it all to their lobby groups such as BCTIA, LSBC, WINBC etc.  I know that there are a handful of hardworking, smart and generous tech executives who do most of the work trying to convince government to see that this industry offers us our best future.

Why do so many tech companies opt out of the political process?  Look at it as part of your marketing budget with a very specific target market!

VIDEO POST: The Knowledge Economy

Monday, February 22nd, 2010
YouTube Preview Image

British Columbia needs a home, a heart, a ‘technology central’.

Monday, February 1st, 2010

In BC we have a little over 4 million souls spread throughout this glorious province – less than 1/10 of 1 percent of the population of the world.

Many of our ‘friendly competitors’ in Canada and abroad have created a place for technology to call home. In some cases this happened by chance, in some cases by design, and occasionally by a combination of the two.

Given that we are social beings, we thrive on being around like-minded folks to reinforce our aspirations and ideas, to challenge our great visions, to share contacts and energy.  It is the friends and family model.

The end game of most technological innovation is to create wealth, a better life and more opportunity – none of which matter much if we don’t have a setting in which to share it all.  BC needs such a home, a heart and a technology central. I see the perfect setting in False Creek Flats in Vancouver, including the yet to be fully developed Great Northern Way Campus.